Vol. I · No. 53THU, JUN 11, 2026
Archive

The Archive

Search the full wire by company, model, lab, or keyword. Every story we have ever aggregated.

Quoting Anthropic

Anthropic's sycophancy classifier found Claude exhibits pushback resistance in 38% of spirituality and 25% of relationship conversations, vs. 9% overall.

·

Why Adaptive Thinking nukes Claude entirely

Reddit user criticizes Anthropic's Adaptive Thinking feature in Claude Opus 4.7 and Sonnet 4.6, claiming models avoid extended thinking when given optimization discretion.

··

I used Claude Code to build a kids safe generative coloring book app for my daughter!

Hey [r/Anthropic](r/Anthropic) Recently I’ve been having a difficult time trying to find safe, kid friendly, easy to use coloring book apps for my child. Most of what I found felt overloaded with ads, confusing, no safeguards, or just way too stimulating for a young kid. So I decided to build one myself. I wanted something that felt simple, calm, and safe the moment a child opens it. The app uses an API to generate coloring pages, but everything saved stays local on the device using SwiftData. I also built in parent protections across the app, so purchases, external links, and even the ter...

···

Anthropic just launched Claude Security in public beta AI that scans your codebase, validates its own findings, and proposes fixes. Here's what actually matters.

Claude Security just went into public beta for Enterprise customers, and I think this is worth paying attention to not for the hype, but for one specific design decision. Most security scanners use rule-based pattern matching. Fast, cheap, and produces a flood of false positives that your team eventually learns to ignore. The signal-to-noise ratio kills adoption. Claude Security takes a different approach: it reasons through the code like a security researcher would. It reads Git history, traces data flows across multiple files, and understands business logic. The goal is catching vulnerab...

··

Pentagon strikes classified AI deals with OpenAI, Google, and Nvidia — but not Anthropic

The Pentagon has struck deals with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Elon Musk's xAI, and the startup Reflection, allowing the agency to use their AI tools in classified settings, according to an announcement on Friday. At the same time, the Defense Department has left out Anthropic - which it previously used for classified information - after declaring it a supply-chain risk. This builds upon deals with OpenAI and xAI, which have already reached agreements with the Pentagon for the "lawful" use of their AI systems. A report from The Information suggests Google has struck a similar a...

·

Are there Humans at Anthropic Support? Claude support is a joke: I paid €80, lost my work, and their AI refused to give me a human

I just went through one of the most infuriating support experiences with Claude / Anthropic, and I need to get this off my chest. I paid extra for Claude Design credits, about €80 worth, and used them to create actual designs I needed for work. Then those designs just vanished. Not “hard to find,” not “moved somewhere else”: gone. Completely disappeared after I paid for the service. I opened support and immediately asked for a refund or, at the very least, to speak to a human. What I got instead was Fin, the AI “agent,” which looped me endlessly through the same bullshit: “Try clearing cac...

··

Half of Google’s and Amazon’s blowout AI profits came from a stake in Anthropic—not from their actual business

Four of the largest U.S. tech companies reported earnings Wednesday afternoon, confirming an AI capital expenditure build-out without modern precedent. Combined, they devoted $130.65 billion to capital expenditures in the first three months of 2026—more than three times the inflation-adjusted cost of the Manhattan Project, in a single quarter. They plan to spend nearly $700 billion this year alone, as much as the U.S. government spends on Medicare. The headline profits suggest that the bet is paying off; Google parent Alphabet’s profits jumped 81% to $62.6 billion last quarter, while Amaz...

··

Opus 4.7 is a regression from 4.6 - real-world document generation broken

Anthropic just released Opus 4.7 as their most advanced model. I reverted to 4.6 within days. I use Claude for production work -- not chat, not summaries. Real deliverables with real deadlines. Here is what happened. I asked 4.7 to update a Word document. It is a task the previous model handled routinely. The new model produced a plain text markdown file with a .docx extension. Not a degraded document. Not a partially formatted document. A file that was literally not a Word document at all. Delivered with full confidence and zero warning that anything was wrong. When I caught it and ...

··

Claude down again

In the middle of a long project with Cowork, Claude goes down-AGAIN. I’m abandoning Anthropic for my important projects. It’s become far too unreliable. It’s a shame, because they have a good product, when it works. The company is clearly distracted and overwhelmed with lots of things having nothing to do with day-to-day performance for its customers.

··

They know what they're doing.

Reddit commentary on Anthropic's compute constraints, per-account experiments, and pricing strategy; unverified claims.

··

The shilling of the /schedule feature is out of control

I'm much more sympathetic towards Anthropic than most users here. Started using CC when it was barely useable and think they are the good guys dealing with a real supply crunch. But every session I get prompted a dozen times to /schedule random tasks for two weeks in advance. Even small features "Want me to /schedule a check in for 2 weeks when this is live"? I realize they are tryign to scale to $100b in a year... they should focus on the product not shilling

··

Larry’s risky business

Oracular spectacular? | Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge If you want to know whether the AI bubble is bursting, there's only one publicly traded company that will tell you: Oracle. That's right, the database company. Oracle has burned its boats and pivoted to AI, but not in any kind of usual way. It is not a foundation model builder like OpenAI or Anthropic, obviously. It's not quite a neocloud, though it has entered the same bare-metal business as CoreWeave. It is a software-as-a-service company that has made an audacious bet on a very specific future version of AI as Oracle's traditional bu...

·
30 matches