The Archive

arXiv paper proves exact global optimum of QPLIB_2096 combinatorial instance via complete set partitioning; ZiYor self-evolving system assisted exploration.

arXiv paper challenges three myths about tokenizer evaluation: BPB is not tokenizer-agnostic, lower BPB doesn't guarantee better models, efficiency depends on hardware.

arXiv paper establishes quantitative Wasserstein distance bounds between point interpolation and distributional approximation in flow-based generative models.

arXiv paper proposes latent-distance-based novelty measurement for biomedical papers using knowledge unit relationships.

arXiv explores conformal prediction for offensive cybersecurity applications including privacy-preserving ML attacks.

arXiv proposes time-to-first-spike SNNs with reference-based encoding for energy-efficient large language models.

Use this plain-text version for the arXiv abstract field: Learned image compression (LIC) models achieve strong rate-distortion performance but are hindered by high computational complexity and encoding-decoding mismatches across heterogeneous hardware platforms. Uniform fixed-precision quantization alleviates these issues but suffers severe quality degradation at low bit widths because it ignores differences in the quantization sensitivities of individual layers. To enable efficient and accurate low-bit deployment of pretrained LIC models, we propose HAMP-LIC, a Hessian-aware mixed-precision...

Survey of 1,250 arXiv papers (2024-2026) categorizing recursive self-improvement in AI systems by loop closure and improvement target.

Pipeline automating physics research from arXiv corpus to publication via LLM agents with external literature grounding to reduce hallucination.

A growing line of work equips large language model (LLM) agents with graph neural networks (GNNs) as callable tools, assuming the agent exercises judgment over when and how much to rely on such a tool. We test this directly. We expose a frozen GNN to a ReAct-style LLM agent as an explicit tool and measure, on node classification over a text-attributed graph (ogbn-arxiv, replicated on WikiCS), whether the agent uses the tool or merely obeys it. We find the agent does not exercise judgment: its predictions agree with the raw GNN's 97.6-99.2% of the time (5 seeds), collapsing into a GNN parrot t...

LLMs are increasingly used to generate and judge scientific ideas. This makes novelty evaluation a central problem. Full idea evaluation is difficult because it often requires judging a method, its feasibility, and its empirical promise. We therefore study a cleaner upstream object: the research question (RQ). RQ generation is a prerequisite for scientific ideation, and RQs can be compared against questions pursued in real papers. We introduce RQ-Bench, a benchmark built from recent arXiv papers. For each paper, we reconstruct author-anchored RQs from its cited background, gaps, and contribut...

Hello everyone. The new dataset is named MONET, is Apache 2.0 and available on HF: [https://huggingface.co/datasets/jasperai/monet](https://huggingface.co/datasets/jasperai/monet) **MONET is open, Apache 2.0-licensed image–text dataset. It was built from 2.9 billion images and refined to 104.9 million high-quality samples.** We are also publishing [a paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21272) that explains how the dataset was created if you are curious and 3 compagnions projects * [A umap to visualize the distribution](https://huggingface.co/spaces/jasperai/monet-umap) * [A retreival tool ...

Link: arxiv.org

ArXiv paper shows small open-source models drop honesty from 35% to 0% when prompt tone shifts from neutral to pressuring language.

ArXiv is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.

arXiv proposes 1-year publishing ban for papers with hallucinated references and LLM artifacts; community backlash highlights tensions between AI adoption and academic integrity standards.

ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop. If a paper has "incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation," such as hallucinated references or "meta-comments" left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv's section chair of its computer science section. Future ArXiv submissions will also have to be accepted at "a reputable peer-reviewed venue." Here's what he said on X: Attention @arxiv authors: Our Co...

One of the site's moderators described the new policy on social media.

Open-source Google Search MCP with PDF extraction for Claude, supporting arxiv/bioRxiv/Nature with tiered abstract/full-text retrieval and CAPTCHA handling.

arXiv implements 1-year ban for papers with unchecked LLM-generated errors like hallucinated references, enforcing author accountability.

Reddit discussion about ECCV reviewer citing author's own prior arxiv work without attribution, requesting comparison to their unpublished version.

**New arxiv paper just landed that's worth reading if you're interested in stylometry, AI revision, or the prose-writing strand of the 4.7 discussion.** Berkeley researcher Tom van Nuenen ran 300 personal narratives through three frontier models (Claude-class, ChatGPT-class, Gemini-class) under three prompt conditions: generic "improve this," generic "rewrite this," and explicitly "revise this while preserving the original voice." He measured 13 stylometric markers in input and output: function words, contractions, first-person pronouns, vocabulary diversity, sentence length variance, punctu...

arXiv paper presenting first direct empirical comparison of Mixture-of-Experts vs dense model architectures.

Reddit discussion: researcher reports CVPR 2026 paper reproduces their June 2025 arXiv work with identical equations but insufficient citation; seeks guidance on plagiarism.

ArXivDoc benchmark shows document-as-image embeddings underperform for scientific retrieval; proposes text/table/figure-structured multimodal approach.

Discussion of arxiv paper volume growth and strategies for staying current with machine learning research.