Vol. I · No. 67THU, JUN 25, 2026
Archive

The Archive

Search the full wire by company, model, lab, or keyword. Every story we have ever aggregated.

Converted Karpathy's coding skill from Pro to free plan. Here's the full thing:

The Karpathy coding skill is locked behind Pro. It doesn't use any Pro-only features, so I rewrote it for free plan chat workflows. Same philosophy, tuned for no terminal, no subagents, and a shorter context window where mistakes are expensive. Paste the whole thing into a Project's custom instructions or use it as a system prompt. It auto-triggers on any coding request. --- name: karpathy-coding description: Apply Karpathy-inspired coding discipline to any programming task. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write, fix, refactor, extend, or review code — even casually...

··

GPT-5.5 was used to flag fatal errors in FrontierMath problems

FrontierMath is supposed to be one of the hard benchmarks for frontier models, and now Epoch is saying an AI-assisted review found fatal errors in about a third of Tiers 1-4. Noam Brown says the initial flags came from GPT-5.5. Obviously we’ll have to wait for the corrected scores, but this is a pretty interesting moment: the model is already strong enough to sanity-check the benchmark.

··

Claude Code just shipped a "run until done" mode. Upgrade to v2.1.139 for /goal.

Morning Everyone! Big one today (**104 changes!**): Claude Code just went async. The new `/goal` command lets you set a completion condition ("all tests pass and the PR is ready"), then Claude keeps grinding across turns until it's hit. The new `claude agents` view shows every session you've got running: working, blocked on you, or done. Translation: kick off a goal -> let claude cook -> come back later. First proper fire-and-forget loop CC has shipped. Pretty huge unlock if you've been juggling multiple sessions and losing track of which one needs you. Full notes: [https://www.luk...

··

ICML Author Removal [D]

PhD student. Need advice. After the ICML abstract deadline, industry coauthors asked to be removed, they missed their employer's internal approval window. They had contributed (discussions and written feedback) but I hadn't explicitly asked before adding them. January: wrote to PC chairs, got written confirmation from all coauthors, got explicit written approval. Chairs said they'd implement. Never happened. Paper accepted four months later with original author list. At camera-ready we followed up. Chairs reversed: blanket policy, no exceptions, keep the list or withdraw. What do you t...

··
30 stories